Core i5-13400T vs Xeon D-1747NTE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,265 vs 20,279).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Xeon D-1747NTE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than Xeon D-1747NTE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1747NTE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $221 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon D-1747NTE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-13400T vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon D-1747NTE's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400T is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon D-1747NTE. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+26%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+92%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+33%	15 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	20,265	20,279
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,094	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,364	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,135	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Xeon D-1747NTE
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) / not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE). The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.