Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon X5680
Ryzen 5 3500U
Xeon X5680
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 5 3500U is positioned at rank 614 and the Xeon X5680 is on rank 704, so the Ryzen 5 3500U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3500U
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5680
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($13) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) / 12 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($13) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon X5680
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon X5680
The Xeon X5680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,910 points. Launch price was $172.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3500U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5680 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon X5680 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500U scores 6,836 against the Xeon X5680's 6,910 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon X5680. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5680.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.33 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-63% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,836 | 6,910+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,545 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 876 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Ryzen 5 3500U versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5680 — the Ryzen 5 3500U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3500U) vs 3 (Xeon X5680). Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Ryzen 5 3500U) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5680).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5680). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon X5680 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget, Xeon X5680 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U; Xeon X5680 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon X5680 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon X5680
