Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v3

16 Cores32 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2698 v3.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,870).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2698 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2698 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2698 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…+6.7% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-2698 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2698 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2698 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2698 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 6.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v3

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,870 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β€” the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 β€” a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019βˆ’2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014βˆ’2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-2698 v3's 18,870 β€” a 6.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2698 v3. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698 v3.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+17%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+57%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
40 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019βˆ’2020)
Haswell-EP (2014βˆ’2015)
PassMark
17,685
18,870+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon E5-2698 v3
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
24
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2698 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon E5-2698 v3
Integrated GPU
No
β€”
Unlocked
Yes
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
Yes
β€”
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation
β€”