
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8895 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,642 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 963.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E7-8895 v2.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 57,165).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8895 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+223.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,642 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 963.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E7-8895 v2.
Why buy it
- ✅+223.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 57,165).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8895 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 927 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 806 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 678 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 638 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 1105 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 983 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 833 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 703 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 887 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 764 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 644 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 407 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon E7-8895 v2


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2
The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 105.5% lead for the Xeon E7-8895 v2. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 15 / 30+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+17% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 37.5 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 57,165+223% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8895 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 1600+39900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+8738033% | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8895 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 debuted at $6841. On MSRP ($199 vs $6841), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $6642 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 165.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-97% | $6841 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+958% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












