
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6152
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6152.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 24,287).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6152, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6152 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6152
2017Why buy it
- ✅+37.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon Gold 6152
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6152.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 24,287).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6152, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6152 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon Gold 6152?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon Gold 6152


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon Gold 6152
Xeon Gold 6152
The Xeon Gold 6152 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,287 points. Launch price was $3,655.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6152 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6152 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6152 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6152 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon Gold 6152's 24,287 — a 31.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6152. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6152.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 22 / 44+267% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+6% | 30.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 22 MB+4300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 24,287+37% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6152 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6152 — the Xeon Gold 6152 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6152 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6152). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6152) — the Xeon Gold 6152 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6152).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2666+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+17476167% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6152 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6152). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon Gold 6152 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6152 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












