Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon D-1747NTE

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon D-1747NTE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 5600F

6 / 12

20,225

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1747NTE

10 / 20

20,279

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 5600F

2025

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1747NTE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,225 vs 20,279).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon D-1747NTE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1747NTE better than Ryzen 5 5600F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon D-1747NTE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1747NTE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1747NTE is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-1747NTE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (204.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 5600F

The Ryzen 5 5600F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,225 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1747NTE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600F versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600F (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600F is built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600F scores 20,225 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon D-1747NTE. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600F vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600F	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+113%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	20,225	20,279

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600F uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600F	Xeon D-1747NTE
Socket	AM4	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—