Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 5600F

6 / 12

20,225

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4667 v4

18 / 36

20,319

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 5600F

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4667 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,225 vs 20,319).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4667 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4667 v4 better than Ryzen 5 5600F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4667 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4667 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (204.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 5600F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 5600F vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 5600F

The Ryzen 5 5600F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,225 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600F versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600F (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600F uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600F scores 20,225 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600F vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600F	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+33%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	45 MB+41%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4.5 MB+800%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	20,225	20,319

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600F uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.