Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Xeon Gold 6138T

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600GT

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024
Ryzen family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6138T

20 Cores40 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Xeon Gold 6138T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Xeon Gold 6138T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Xeon Gold 6138T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 5600GT

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $2,602 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1854.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 145.1 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon Gold 6138T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,300 vs 11,988).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138T, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6138T

2017

Why buy it

  • +28.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • +71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600GT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 145.1 PassMark/$ ($2,742 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600GT can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600GT.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600GT better than Xeon Gold 6138T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6138T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600GT is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6138T is the stronger fit. You are getting 28.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5600GT is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 5600GT comes in $2,602 cheaper on MSRP at $140 MSRP versus $2,742 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6138T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 28.9% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 1854.3% better value on MSRP (145.1 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600GT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 5600GT vs Xeon Gold 6138T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600GT

The Ryzen 5 5600GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $140.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6138T

The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600GT packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600GT versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600GT (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600GT uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600GT scores 20,312 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,030, a 64% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600GT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,300 vs 11,988 (25.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600GT vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600GTXeon Gold 6138T
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
20 / 40+233%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+24%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB
27.5 MB+72%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
20 MB+3900%
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Cezanne (2021−2025)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
20,312
20,356
Geekbench 6 Single
2,000+94%
1,030
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,300
11,988+29%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600GT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600GT versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6138T — the Ryzen 5 5600GT supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6138T supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600GT) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6138T). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600GT) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6138T) — the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A520,B550,X570,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 5600GT) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6138T).

FeatureRyzen 5 5600GTXeon Gold 6138T
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+20%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
768 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
48+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon Gold 6138T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600GT) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 6138T). The Ryzen 5 5600GT includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon Gold 6138T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600GT targets Budget Gaming/Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600GTXeon Gold 6138T
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Budget Gaming/Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 5600GT was priced at $140, while the Xeon Gold 6138T came in at $2742. On launch pricing ($140 vs $2742), Ryzen 5 5600GT was $2602 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600GT delivers 145.1 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6138T — making the Ryzen 5 5600GT the 180.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600GTXeon Gold 6138T
MSRP
$140-95%
$2742
Performance per Dollar
145.1+1861%
7.4
Release Date
2024
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.