
Ryzen 5 5600X

Xeon E5-1620 v3
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5-1620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +63.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+220% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅Delivers 208.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1620 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌1.7% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E5-1620 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,959 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon E5-1620 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-1620 v3
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 6,959 — a 103.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+220% | 10 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 21,845+214% | 6,959 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — the Ryzen 5 5600X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1620 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-1620 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-1620 v3) — the Xeon E5-1620 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-1620 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon E5-1620 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 5600X was priced at $299, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($299 vs $294), Xeon E5-1620 v3 was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 102.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $294-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+208% | 23.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














