
Ryzen 5 5600X

Xeon E5440
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5440 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5440 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +272.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Costs $391 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
- β Delivers 2029.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 3.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E5440
2007Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,367 vs 21,845).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($690 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon E5440?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5440 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5440
The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007β2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Ryzen 5 5600X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 β a 138.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5440 uses Harpertown (2007β2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 β a 160.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+454% | 0.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+31% | 2.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+8433% | 6 MB (total) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) | Harpertown (2007β2008) |
| PassMark | 21,845+823% | 2,367 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon E5440). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 5600X was priced at $299, while the Xeon E5440 came in at $690. On launch pricing ($299 vs $690), Ryzen 5 5600X was $391 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 3.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 β making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 182.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-57% | $690 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+2050% | 3.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














