
Ryzen 5 5600XT
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $607 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 320.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 116.2 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,310).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 116.2 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600XT
2024Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $607 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 320.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 116.2 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,310).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 116.2 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600XT better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 524 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600XT and Ryzen Threadripper 1920


Ryzen 5 5600XT
Ryzen 5 5600XT
The Ryzen 5 5600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,310 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600XT packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600XT versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 21.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600XT (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600XT uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 22,310 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600XT. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+24% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,310+1% | 22,066 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600XT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600XT launched at $192 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($192 vs $799), the Ryzen 5 5600XT is $607 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600XT delivers 116.2 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen 5 5600XT the 123.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-76% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 116.2+321% | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











