
Ryzen 5 5600XT

Xeon E5-4640 v4
Ryzen 5 5600XT vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 5600XT vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 5600XT vs Xeon E5-4640 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 5600XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,645 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $2,837 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1361.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 116.2 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $2,837 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,310 vs 22,559).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 116.2 PassMark/$ ($2,837 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600XT better than Xeon E5-4640 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600XT vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 5600XT
The Ryzen 5 5600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,310 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4640 v4
The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,559 points. Launch price was $2,837.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600XT packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600XT versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — a 57.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600XT (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600XT uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 22,310 against the Xeon E5-4640 v4's 22,559 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4640 v4. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600XT vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-4640 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+81% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+7% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,310 | 22,559+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600XT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4 2133 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1.5 TB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 5600XT) / true (Xeon E5-4640 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-4640 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 5600XT was priced at $192, while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 came in at $2837. On launch pricing ($192 vs $2837), Ryzen 5 5600XT was $2645 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600XT delivers 116.2 pts/$ vs 8.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 5600XT the 174.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600XT | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-93% | $2837 |
| Performance per Dollar | 116.2+1353% | 8.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













