
Ryzen 5 7600X

Xeon W-3245M
Ryzen 5 7600X vs Xeon W-3245M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 7600X vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 7600X vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,703 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1563.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 18,500).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3245M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 7600X vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3245M
The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 18,500 (18.9% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 1,474, a 65.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 11,572 (17.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+15% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+47% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+45% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 16 MB+167% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 28,325 | 28,494 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | 18,500+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900+97% | 1,474 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800+19% | 11,572 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Ryzen 5 7600X supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+77% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Professional Workstation / Mac Pro |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 7600X was priced at $299, while the Xeon W-3245M came in at $5002. On launch pricing ($299 vs $5002), Ryzen 5 7600X was $4703 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245M — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 177.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-94% | $5002 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.7+1561% | 5.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














