
Ryzen 5 7640U
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2753NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 87W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2753NT, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon D-2753NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,626 vs 20,856).
- ❌480% higher power demand at 87W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023Xeon D-2753NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 87W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2753NT, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,626 vs 20,856).
- ❌480% higher power demand at 87W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640U better than Xeon D-2753NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640U | Xeon D-2753NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640U | Xeon D-2753NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640U | Xeon D-2753NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640U | Xeon D-2753NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640U and Xeon D-2753NT


Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U
The Ryzen 5 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,856 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2753NT
Xeon D-2753NT
The Xeon D-2753NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 87 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,626 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-2753NT offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-2753NT has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640U versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2753NT — a 45% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640U is built on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640U scores 20,856 against the Xeon D-2753NT's 20,626 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640U vs 20 MB on the Xeon D-2753NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640U | Xeon D-2753NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+58% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 20 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 20,856+1% | 20,626 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2753NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640U | Xeon D-2753NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












