
Ryzen 5 8500G

Xeon E5-2673 v4
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2673 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 8500G
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2673 v4
2016Why buy it
- β +212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8500G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,277 vs 21,481).
- β107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8500G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8500G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8500G better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 8500G
The Ryzen 5 8500G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,481 points. Launch price was $229.

Xeon E5-2673 v4
The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8500G packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads β the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8500G versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 β a 74% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8500G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8500G uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses Broadwell (2015β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8500G scores 21,481 against the Xeon E5-2673 v4's 21,277 β a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 8500G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8500G vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 20 / 40+233% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+117% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+52% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 50 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 5 MB+400% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | Broadwell (2015β2019) |
| PassMark | 21,481 | 21,277 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,310 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,500 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8500G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FCLGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 8500G) / not specified (Xeon E5-2673 v4). The Ryzen 5 8500G includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8500G targets General Use. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8500G rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 740M | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | General Use | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













