
Ryzen 5 8500G

Xeon E5-2697A v4
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2697A v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 8500G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,712 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1504.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.0 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,481 vs 21,621).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697A v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8500G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 120.0 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8500G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8500G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8500G better than Xeon E5-2697A v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 8500G
The Ryzen 5 8500G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,481 points. Launch price was $229.

Xeon E5-2697A v4
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8500G packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8500G versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8500G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8500G uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8500G scores 21,481 against the Xeon E5-2697A v4's 21,621 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2697A v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8500G vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+39% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 40 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,481 | 21,621 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,310 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8500G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 8500G) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697A v4). The Ryzen 5 8500G includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8500G targets General Use. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8500G rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 740M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | General Use | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 8500G was priced at $179, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 came in at $2891. On launch pricing ($179 vs $2891), Ryzen 5 8500G was $2712 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 8500G delivers 120.0 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — making the Ryzen 5 8500G the 176.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8500G | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-94% | $2891 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.0+1500% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














