Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Ryzen 7 6800HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Ryzen 7 6800HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Ryzen 7 6800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 22,652).

Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U better than Ryzen 7 6800HS?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is ahead with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 6800HS pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 6800HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Ryzen 7 6800HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,652 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 6800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 6800HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800HS — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U scores 22,373 against the Ryzen 7 6800HS's 22,652 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U	Ryzen 7 6800HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+4%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-33%	6 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	22,373	22,652+1%