Ryzen 7 2700X vs Xeon E5-4669 v4
Ryzen 7 2700X
Xeon E5-4669 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 2700X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-4669 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+198%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon E5-4669 v4
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.
Xeon E5-4669 v4
The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700X scores 17,450 against the Xeon E5-4669 v4's 17,547 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4669 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 22 / 44+175% |
| Boost Clock | 4.35 GHz+45% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+68% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 55 MB+244% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 5.5 MB+1000% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,450 | 17,547 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,730 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 825 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,882 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon E5-4669 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 2700X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-4669 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 2700X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-4669 v4) — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 2700X) and C610 (Xeon E5-4669 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1536 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X) vs Yes (Xeon E5-4669 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 2700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 debuted at $7007. At current prices ($100 vs $300), the Ryzen 7 2700X is $200 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700X delivers 174.5 pts/$ vs 58.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 2700X the 99.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $7007 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 174.5+198% | 58.5 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon E5-4669 v4
