
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $4,162 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Delivers 386.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 62,946).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +28.8% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $4,162 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Delivers 386.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +28.8% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 62,946).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3970X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 927 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 862 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 765 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1325 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 1073 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1031 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 900 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 778 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X β a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 β a 94.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 62,946+181% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 44,510 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,664 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 13,739 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) β the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X debuted at $4491. On MSRP ($329 vs $4491), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $4162 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 131.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-93% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+387% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











