PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,236 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 61,404).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 96 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6710E, which brings 64 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6710E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅+173.8% higher PassMark.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,236 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+173.8% higher PassMark.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 61,404).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 96 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6710E, which brings 64 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6710E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6710E?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6710E makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6710E is the better fit. You are getting 173.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $1,236 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,565 MSRP, and it gives you a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6710E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 173.8% better PassMark. It is also 73.8% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 39.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6710E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 200% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon 6710E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	200 FPS	189 FPS
medium	163 FPS	152 FPS
high	137 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	153 FPS
medium	121 FPS	119 FPS
high	100 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	71 FPS
medium	71 FPS	59 FPS
high	56 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6710E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	561 FPS	437 FPS
medium	525 FPS	378 FPS
high	428 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	241 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	359 FPS
medium	471 FPS	319 FPS
high	394 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	222 FPS
medium	304 FPS	201 FPS
high	274 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	135 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6710E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	561 FPS	934 FPS
medium	561 FPS	831 FPS
high	561 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	746 FPS
medium	561 FPS	655 FPS
high	538 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	546 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	479 FPS
medium	394 FPS	378 FPS
high	343 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6710E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
1080p
low	561 FPS	918 FPS
medium	561 FPS	830 FPS
high	561 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	710 FPS
medium	561 FPS	620 FPS
high	561 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	450 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	509 FPS
medium	501 FPS	455 FPS
high	447 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	344 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6710E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6710E

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6710E

The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6710E offers 64 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6710E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6710E's 61,404 — a 93% lead for the Xeon 6710E. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	64 / 64+700%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+38%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	96 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	4 MB (per module)+700%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	22,430	61,404+174%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,225
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,400

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6710E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E — the Xeon 6710E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6710E). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6710E) — the Xeon 6710E offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon 6710E).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
Socket	AM4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E). Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6710E
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Efficiency Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6710E debuted at $1565. On MSRP ($329 vs $1565), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1236 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 39.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6710E — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 53.9% better value option.