
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6781P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,631 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 417.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 117,946).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 336 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6781P, which brings 80 cores / 160 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6781P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6781P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+425.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+950% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 80 cores / 160 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅466.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon 6781P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,631 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 417.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+425.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+950% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 80 cores / 160 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅466.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 117,946).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 336 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6781P, which brings 80 cores / 160 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6781P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6781P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 958 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 864 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 745 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 783 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6781P


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6781P
Xeon 6781P
The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the Xeon 6781P has 72 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 136.1% lead for the Xeon 6781P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 80 / 160+900% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 336 MB (total)+950% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 117,946+426% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6781P — the Xeon 6781P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4 TB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 136+467% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | Data Center / Cloud Scale |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6781P debuted at $8960. On MSRP ($329 vs $8960), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $8631 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 135.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-96% | $8960 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+417% | 13.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











