
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2799
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 129W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,792).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2799, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2799 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2799
2022Why buy it
- ✅+50.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌98.5% higher power demand at 129W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon D-2799
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 129W, a 64W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+50.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,792).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2799, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2799 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌98.5% higher power demand at 129W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon D-2799?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 785 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 680 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 596 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon D-2799


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon D-2799
Xeon D-2799
The Xeon D-2799 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 129 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 33,792 points. Launch price was $1,972.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2799 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2799 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon D-2799 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-2799 uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon D-2799's 33,792 — a 40.4% lead for the Xeon D-2799. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2799.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+29% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+7% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 33,792+51% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 20,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,959 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,895 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2799 uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon D-2799 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon D-2799). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 32 (Xeon D-2799) — the Xeon D-2799 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Ice Lake-D (Xeon D-2799).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon D-2799). Primary use case: Xeon D-2799 targets Edge Server / Networking. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2799 rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2799 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Edge Server / Networking |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











