
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2246G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 53.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌5.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$311 MSRP
Xeon E-2246G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $18 less on MSRP ($311 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,832 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon E-2246G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 53.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $18 less on MSRP ($311 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌5.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$311 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,832 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E-2246G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 152 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E-2246G


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E-2246G
Xeon E-2246G
The Xeon E-2246G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,832 points. Launch price was $311.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2246G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2246G — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2246G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E-2246G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E-2246G's 13,832 — a 47.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2246G.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,430+62% | 13,832 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2246G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon E-2246G debuted at $311. On MSRP ($329 vs $311), the Xeon E-2246G is $18 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 44.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2246G — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 42.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2246G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $311-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+53% | 44.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











