
Ryzen 7 3700X

Xeon E7-8895 v2
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E7-8895 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,512 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 715.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,165).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8895 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+154.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E7-8895 v2
The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 87.3% lead for the Xeon E7-8895 v2. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 15 / 30+88% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 37.5 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 57,165+155% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8895 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+100% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8895 v2). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 3700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 came in at $6841. On launch pricing ($329 vs $6841), Ryzen 7 3700X was $6512 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 156.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-8895 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $6841 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+712% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













