
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6138
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,283 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 638.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 24,108).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6138
2017Why buy it
- ✅+7.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6138
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,283 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 638.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+7.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 24,108).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6138?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 563 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6138


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6138
Xeon Gold 6138
The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6138's 24,108 — a 7.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 24,108+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,261 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,439 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6138 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6138). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6138) — the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6138).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6138). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6138 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6138 debuted at $2612. On MSRP ($329 vs $2612), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $2283 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6138 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 152.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-87% | $2612 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+641% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











