
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6423N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,832 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 195W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,434).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 53 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6423N, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6423N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6423N
2023Why buy it
- ✅+156.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,161 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 195W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6423N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,832 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 195W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+156.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,434).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 53 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6423N, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6423N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,161 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 195W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6423N?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 945 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 827 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 782 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 610 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 541 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 835 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 719 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 628 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6423N


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6423N
Xeon Gold 6423N
The Xeon Gold 6423N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2023-07-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 195 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,434 points. Launch price was $2,161.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6423N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6423N has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6423N — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6423N's 57,434 — a 87.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6423N. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6423N.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 28 / 56+250% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 52.5 MB+64% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 57,434+156% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6423N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6423N — the Xeon Gold 6423N supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6423N supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6423N). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6423N) — the Xeon Gold 6423N offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6423N).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6423N). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6423N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6423N debuted at $2161. On MSRP ($329 vs $2161), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1832 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6423N — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 87.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-85% | $2161 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+156% | 26.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











