
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,168 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 455.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 79,683).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 300 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+255.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+837.5% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,168 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 455.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+255.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+837.5% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 79,683).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 300 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 956 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 865 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 790 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 392 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 112.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 48 / 96+500% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 300 MB (total)+838% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 79,683+255% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($329 vs $6497), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $6168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 139% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+454% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











