
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-10855M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-10855M


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 58.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+83% | 12,249 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-10855M debuted at $118. On MSRP ($329 vs $118), the Xeon W-10855M is $211 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Xeon W-10855M the 41.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $118-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2 | 103.8+52% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











