
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2235
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,235 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,235 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-2235?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-2235


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-2235
Xeon W-2235
The Xeon W-2235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,235 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2235 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2235 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2235 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-2235's 14,235 — a 44.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2235.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+288% | 8.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430+58% | 14,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2235 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2235 debuted at $555. On MSRP ($329 vs $555), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2235 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 90.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-41% | $555 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+166% | 25.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











