Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-3323

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-3323

12 Cores24 Thrd220 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • +77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Costs $620 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,822).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3323, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon W-3323

2021

Why buy it

  • +24% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-3323?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3323 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3323 is the better fit. You are getting 24% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $620 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $949 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3323 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 24% better PassMark. It is also 132.5% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 29.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-3323 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
1080p
low200 FPS176 FPS
medium163 FPS140 FPS
high137 FPS115 FPS
ultra110 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS146 FPS
medium121 FPS114 FPS
high100 FPS92 FPS
ultra80 FPS73 FPS
4K
low84 FPS67 FPS
medium71 FPS56 FPS
high56 FPS45 FPS
ultra44 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
1080p
low561 FPS447 FPS
medium525 FPS385 FPS
high428 FPS313 FPS
ultra383 FPS264 FPS
1440p
low545 FPS384 FPS
medium471 FPS342 FPS
high394 FPS283 FPS
ultra337 FPS234 FPS
4K
low350 FPS246 FPS
medium304 FPS221 FPS
high274 FPS196 FPS
ultra242 FPS162 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
1080p
low561 FPS696 FPS
medium561 FPS696 FPS
high561 FPS696 FPS
ultra561 FPS693 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS696 FPS
medium561 FPS642 FPS
high538 FPS608 FPS
ultra470 FPS537 FPS
4K
low499 FPS482 FPS
medium394 FPS377 FPS
high343 FPS336 FPS
ultra275 FPS273 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
1080p
low561 FPS696 FPS
medium561 FPS696 FPS
high561 FPS696 FPS
ultra561 FPS602 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS696 FPS
medium561 FPS615 FPS
high561 FPS533 FPS
ultra555 FPS458 FPS
4K
low561 FPS482 FPS
medium501 FPS433 FPS
high447 FPS388 FPS
ultra396 FPS338 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-3323

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon W-3323

The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3323 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 21.5% lead for the Xeon W-3323. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+13%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+78%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark
22,430
27,822+24%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
Socket
AM4
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3323 debuted at $949. On MSRP ($329 vs $949), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $620 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 79.7% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon W-3323
MSRP
$329-65%
$949
Performance per Dollar
68.2+133%
29.3
Release Date
2019
2021