PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,360 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
✅Delivers 117.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 31.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 52,951).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-2575X, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2575X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-2575X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,689 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon w7-2575X

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,360 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
✅Delivers 117.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 31.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 52,951).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-2575X, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2575X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,689 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2575X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w7-2575X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-2575X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2575X is the better fit. You are getting 136.1% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-2575X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w7-2575X is 413.4% more expensive on MSRP at $1,689 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 117.5% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 31.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-2575X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 22 cores / 44 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-2575X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
1080p
low	200 FPS	340 FPS
medium	163 FPS	312 FPS
high	137 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	213 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	288 FPS
medium	121 FPS	235 FPS
high	100 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	198 FPS
medium	71 FPS	161 FPS
high	56 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	108 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w7-2575X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
1080p
low	561 FPS	693 FPS
medium	525 FPS	586 FPS
high	428 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	407 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	557 FPS
medium	471 FPS	486 FPS
high	394 FPS	401 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	328 FPS
medium	304 FPS	289 FPS
high	274 FPS	263 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	233 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w7-2575X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
1080p
low	561 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1252 FPS
high	561 FPS	1143 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	961 FPS
high	538 FPS	864 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	660 FPS
medium	394 FPS	559 FPS
high	343 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	425 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w7-2575X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
1080p
low	561 FPS	1252 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1015 FPS
high	561 FPS	951 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	827 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	969 FPS
medium	561 FPS	835 FPS
high	561 FPS	728 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	624 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	716 FPS
medium	501 FPS	618 FPS
high	447 FPS	543 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w7-2575X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w7-2575X

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w7-2575X

The Xeon w7-2575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,951 points. Launch price was $1,689.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w7-2575X offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon w7-2575X has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2575X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2575X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-2575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w7-2575X's 52,951 — a 81% lead for the Xeon w7-2575X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 45 MB on the Xeon w7-2575X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+20%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	45 MB+41%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	22,430	52,951+136%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,640

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2575X — the Xeon w7-2575X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2575X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2575X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2575X) — the Xeon w7-2575X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-2575X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon w7-2575X). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-2575X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-2575X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2575X debuted at $1689. On MSRP ($329 vs $1689), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1360 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 31.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2575X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 74% better value option.