Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w7-3465X

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3465X

28 Cores56 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w7-3465X Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon w7-3465X

28 / 56

62,663

+179.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w7-3465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w7-3465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,560 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 214.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3465X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 62,663).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 75 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3465X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3465X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (75 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3465X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w7-3465X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3465X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3465X is the stronger fit. You are getting 179.4% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (75 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3465X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-3465X comes in 778.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,889 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 214.3% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 21.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3465X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 134.4% larger total L3 cache (75 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w7-3465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w7-3465X

The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon w7-3465X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 94.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-3465X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	28 / 56+250%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+44%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	75 MB+134%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	22,430	62,663+179%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,959
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,351

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3465X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3465X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the Xeon w7-3465X offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-3465X
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	112+367%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon w7-3465X). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-3465X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 3700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon w7-3465X came in at $2889. On launch pricing ($329 vs $2889), Ryzen 7 3700X was $2560 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 103.5% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP	$329-89%	$2889
Performance per Dollar	68.2+214%	21.7
Release Date	2019	2023

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.