Ryzen 7 3750H
VS
Core i5-10200H

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-10200H

AMD

Ryzen 7 3750H

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i5-10200H

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10200H

#14
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
165%
#15
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
163%
#16
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
149%
#17
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
149%
#18
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
147%
#20
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
142%
#21
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
136%
#22
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
136%
#23
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
133%
#26
Core i5-10200H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
98%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
98%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
97%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
96%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
96%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
96%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
94%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
87%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-10200H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 7 3750H in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 7 3750HCore i5-10200H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (Zen+) (2019) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-H (2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 3750HCore i5-10200H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-10200H

AMD

Ryzen 7 3750H

The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-10200H

The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-10200H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10200H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3750H uses the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-10200H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3750H scores 7,990 against the Core i5-10200H's 7,997 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-10200H. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H.

FeatureRyzen 7 3750HCore i5-10200H
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Picasso (Zen+) (2019)
Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark
7,990
7,997
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,372
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,392
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3750H uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10200H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 3750HCore i5-10200H
Socket
FP5
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H) / Yes (Core i5-10200H). The Core i5-10200H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen 7 3750HCore i5-10200H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes