Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 4800H

8 / 16

18,086

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2697 v3

14 / 28

18,182

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon E5-2697 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 4800H

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,086 vs 18,182).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon E5-2697 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2697 v3 better than Ryzen 7 4800H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2697 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4800H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2697 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2697 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2697 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2697 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4800H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 4800H

The Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,086 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2697 v3

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,182 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 4800H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v3 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4800H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4800H uses the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4800H scores 18,086 against the Xeon E5-2697 v3's 18,182 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2697 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800H vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 4800H	Xeon E5-2697 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+17%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	35 MB (total)+338%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	18,086	18,182

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 4800H uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.