EPYC 4124P
VS
Ryzen 7 4800H

EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD

EPYC 4124P

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 4800H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4124P

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
101%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
101%
#103
EPYC 4124P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 4124P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 4124PRyzen 7 4800H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 7 4800H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 4124PRyzen 7 4800H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4124P and Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD

EPYC 4124P

The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 4800H

The Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,086 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4800H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 4800H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800H — a 19.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4800H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Ryzen 7 4800H's 18,086 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 4124P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800H.

FeatureEPYC 4124PRyzen 7 4800H
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+21%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+31%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+300%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
18,139
18,086
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4800H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 4124PRyzen 7 4800H
Socket
AM5
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4800H). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 4800H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.

FeatureEPYC 4124PRyzen 7 4800H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Entry Server