EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 4800H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 4800H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 4800H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4124P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen 7 4800H

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4124P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,086 vs 18,139).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4124P, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while EPYC 4124P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4124P better than Ryzen 7 4800H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4124P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4800H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4124P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4124P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4124P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 4124P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 4800H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4124P

The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 7 4800H

The Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,086 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4800H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 4800H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800H — a 19.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4800H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Ryzen 7 4800H's 18,086 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 4124P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800H.

Feature	EPYC 4124P	Ryzen 7 4800H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+21%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+31%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+300%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	18,139	18,086
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4800H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 4124P	Ryzen 7 4800H
Socket	AM5	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4800H). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 4800H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.