
EPYC 4124P vs Xeon W-3225

EPYC 4124P

Xeon W-3225
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4124P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3225
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4124P | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4124P | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4124P and Xeon W-3225

EPYC 4124P
The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-3225 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3225 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3225 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Xeon W-3225's 18,251 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-3225. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 10,500 vs 11,500 (9.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,150, a 52.2% lead for the EPYC 4124P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 9,100 (131% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225.
| Feature | EPYC 4124P | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+16% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 18,139 | 18,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,500 | 11,500+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962+71% | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 9,100+379% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3225 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4124P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3225 — the EPYC 4124P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3225 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4124P) vs 6 (Xeon W-3225). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4124P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3225) — the Xeon W-3225 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4124P) and C621 (Xeon W-3225).
| Feature | EPYC 4124P | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3225 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server, Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T; Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | EPYC 4124P | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















