EPYC 4124P vs Xeon Gold 5120

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon Gold 5120 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4124P

4 / 8

18,139

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 5120

14 / 28

18,132

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon Gold 5120 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon Gold 5120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4124P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 5120

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4124P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,132 vs 18,139).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 4124P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4124P better than Xeon Gold 5120?

Yes. EPYC 4124P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4124P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4124P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4124P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 4124P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 14/28, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon Gold 5120 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4124P

The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Gold 5120

The Xeon Gold 5120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,132 points. Launch price was $1,555.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5120 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 5120 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5120 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5120 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Xeon Gold 5120's 18,132 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 4124P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 5120.

Feature	EPYC 4124P	Xeon Gold 5120
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+59%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+66%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	14 MB+1300%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	18,139	18,132
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5120 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 4124P	Xeon Gold 5120
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5120). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.