EPYC 4124P vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4124P

4 / 8

18,139

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2697 v3

14 / 28

18,182

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon E5-2697 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4124P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon E5-2697 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,139 vs 18,182).

Xeon E5-2697 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4124P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while EPYC 4124P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4124P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4124P better than Xeon E5-2697 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4124P is ahead with a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2697 v3 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2697 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4124P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 4124P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4124P vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4124P

The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2697 v3

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,182 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v3 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Xeon E5-2697 v3's 18,182 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2697 v3. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v3.

Feature	EPYC 4124P	Xeon E5-2697 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+42%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	35 MB (total)+9%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	5 nm-77%	22 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	18,139	18,182
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 4124P	Xeon E5-2697 v3
Socket	AM5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v3). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.