Ryzen 7 5700 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 5700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-2679 v4

20 Cores40 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5700 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 5700

8 / 16

24,317

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2679 v4

20 / 40

24,131

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 5700 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 5700 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 5700

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,523 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1421.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 135.8 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,600 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+39.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 135.8 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700 better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 39.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5700 comes in $2,523 cheaper on MSRP at $179 MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 39.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 1421.1% better value on MSRP (135.8 vs 8.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 5700 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 5700

The Ryzen 7 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,317 points. Launch price was $179.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700 scores 24,317 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,000, a 66.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 12,000 (33% advantage for the Xeon E5-2679 v4). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 5700 vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+39%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+48%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	50 MB+213%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	5 MB+900%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Cezanne (2021−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,317	24,131
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000+100%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	12,000+40%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — the Ryzen 7 5700 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2679 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2679 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2679 v4) — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A520,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2679 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700 rivals Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 5700 was priced at $179, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 came in at $2702. On launch pricing ($179 vs $2702), Ryzen 7 5700 was $2523 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700 delivers 135.8 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 5700 the 175.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP	$179-93%	$2702
Performance per Dollar	135.8+1426%	8.9
Release Date	2022	2016

Search Ryzen 7 5700 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2679 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.