PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700G

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,343 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 659.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 67.9 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2679 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 67.9 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5700G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700G.

Ryzen 7 5700G

2021

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,343 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 659.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 67.9 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2679 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 67.9 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5700G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700G.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2679 v4 better than Ryzen 7 5700G?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700G is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 33.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2679 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700G makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E5-2679 v4 is 652.6% more expensive on MSRP at $2,702 MSRP versus $359 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700G is also 659.8% better value on MSRP (67.9 vs 8.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700G Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2679 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	200 FPS	182 FPS
medium	173 FPS	160 FPS
high	139 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	169 FPS	151 FPS
medium	141 FPS	127 FPS
high	112 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	70 FPS
medium	75 FPS	62 FPS
high	59 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700G Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	474 FPS	364 FPS
medium	394 FPS	331 FPS
high	345 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	224 FPS
1440p
low	409 FPS	313 FPS
medium	351 FPS	284 FPS
high	313 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	266 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	283 FPS	195 FPS
medium	249 FPS	178 FPS
high	235 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	120 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700G Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	582 FPS	603 FPS
medium	484 FPS	603 FPS
high	438 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	603 FPS
1440p
low	525 FPS	603 FPS
medium	445 FPS	590 FPS
high	401 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	345 FPS	505 FPS
4K
low	398 FPS	447 FPS
medium	332 FPS	363 FPS
high	291 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700G Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	609 FPS	603 FPS
medium	609 FPS	603 FPS
high	609 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	609 FPS	585 FPS
1440p
low	609 FPS	603 FPS
medium	609 FPS	603 FPS
high	609 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	609 FPS	462 FPS
4K
low	609 FPS	527 FPS
medium	590 FPS	472 FPS
high	528 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	359 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700G Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700G and Xeon E5-2679 v4

Ryzen 7 5700G

The Ryzen 7 5700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 April 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,360 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700G versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700G (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700G uses the Cezanne (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700G scores 24,360 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700G. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,500 vs 1,000, a 40% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,000 vs 12,000 (28.6% advantage for the Xeon E5-2679 v4). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 5700G vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+39%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+52%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	50 MB+213%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	5 MB+900%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Cezanne (Zen 3) (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,360	24,131
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,500+50%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,000	12,000+33%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2679 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2679 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2679 v4) — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700G) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2679 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700G) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4). The Ryzen 7 5700G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700G targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700G rivals Core i7-11700.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700G	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 8	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700G launched at $359 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($359 vs $2702), the Ryzen 7 5700G is $2343 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700G delivers 67.9 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 5700G the 153.5% better value option.