Ryzen 7 5800HS
VS
Core Ultra 7 256V

Ryzen 7 5800HS vs Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800HS

#141
Ryzen 7 5800HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
98%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 7 256V delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 7 5800HS in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 7 5800HSCore Ultra 7 256V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 5800HSCore Ultra 7 256V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800HS and Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 256V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800HS scores 19,512 against the Core Ultra 7 256V's 19,579 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 256V.

FeatureRyzen 7 5800HSCore Ultra 7 256V
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+27%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,512
19,579
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
Geekbench 6 Single
2,658
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 5800HSCore Ultra 7 256V
Socket
FP6
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS) / true (Core Ultra 7 256V). The Core Ultra 7 256V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile.

FeatureRyzen 7 5800HSCore Ultra 7 256V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile