Ryzen 7 5800HS vs Ryzen 5 PRO 230

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800HS

#141

Ryzen 7 5800HS

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#144

Core i7-12650H

MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A

98%

#153

Core i7-1370P

MSRP: $438|Avg: $280

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 230

#10

Ryzen 7 260

MSRP: $199|Avg: $70

108%

#13

Ryzen 3 210

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

102%

#14

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#15

Ryzen 5 220

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#18

Ryzen 5 8500G

MSRP: $179|Avg: $150

91%

#27

Core Ultra 7 265HX

MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 7 5800HS in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Ryzen 7 5800HS	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) / 7 nm)	✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Ryzen 7 5800HS	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5800HS Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 230 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Ryzen 7 5800HS

The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800HS scores 19,512 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5800HS	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	6 MB+1100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark	19,512	19,702
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,320
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,210

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5800HS	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Socket	FP6	FP7/FP7r2/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	—	256 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	✅
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS requires a dedicated GPU.