
Core Ultra 7 265K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 58,789).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 58,789).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 265K better than Ryzen 7 7735H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 656 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 491 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 851 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1128 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 889 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 808 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 892 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 789 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 687 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 611 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 376 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265K and Ryzen 7 7735H

Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K
The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265K packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265K scores 58,789 against the Ryzen 7 7735H's 23,619 — a 85.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+16% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+22% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-50% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 58,789+149% | 23,619 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 36,309 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,283 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,293 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 7 265K supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 7 265K supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Graphics 64EU (Core Ultra 7 265K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 64EU | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












