
Ryzen 7 7736U

Xeon E5-2697A v4
Ryzen 7 7736U vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 7736U vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 7736U vs Xeon E5-2697A v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 7736U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 145W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon E5-2697A v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697A v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 21,696).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,891 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7736U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌866.7% higher power demand at 145W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7736U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7736U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7736U better than Xeon E5-2697A v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7736U vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 7736U
The Ryzen 7 7736U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,696 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2697A v4
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7736U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7736U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7736U (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7736U uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7736U scores 21,696 against the Xeon E5-2697A v4's 21,621 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7736U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7736U vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7736U | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+31% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+4% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 40 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+12700% | 4 MB |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,696 | 21,621 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,768 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,869 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,020 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7736U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7736U | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7736U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697A v4). The Ryzen 7 7736U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7736U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7736U rivals Core i7-1255U.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7736U | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













