
Ryzen 7 7840H

Xeon W-2195
Ryzen 7 7840H vs Xeon W-2195 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 7840H vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 7840H vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 7840H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,832 vs 27,977).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2195
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840H better than Xeon W-2195?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7840H vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 7840H
The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2195
The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840H uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 27,832 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-2195. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840H | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+65% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total)+55% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 27,832 | 27,977 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,002 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840H uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840H | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 512 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 7840H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840H | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













