Ryzen 7 7840H
VS
Xeon W-2195

Ryzen 7 7840H vs Xeon W-2195

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon W-2195

18 Cores36 Thrd140 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-2195

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
100%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
78%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
67%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
65%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 7840H (2023) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5-5600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 7 7840HXeon W-2195
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Phoenix (2023−2024) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W-2195 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 7 7840HXeon W-2195
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon W-2195

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7840H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840H uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 27,832 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-2195. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

FeatureRyzen 7 7840HXeon W-2195
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+19%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+65%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
24.75 MB (total)+55%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Phoenix (2023−2024)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
27,832
27,977
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,002
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840H uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 7840HXeon W-2195
Socket
FP8
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
512 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 7840H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

FeatureRyzen 7 7840HXeon W-2195
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis