EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 7 7840H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 7 7840H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 7 7840H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌342.9% higher power demand at 155W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840H moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7840H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 155W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,832 vs 27,836).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840H better than EPYC 7401P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7401P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840H still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 7840H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 7 7840H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

Ryzen 7 7840H

The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840H (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7401P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Ryzen 7 7840H's 27,832 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7401P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H.

Feature	EPYC 7401P	Ryzen 7 7840H
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	5.1 GHz+70%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	27,836	27,832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.