EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-2275

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-2275 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7401P

24 / 48

27,836

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon W-2275

14 / 28

27,974

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-2275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-2275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,836 vs 27,974).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,112 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2275 better than EPYC 7401P?

Yes. Xeon W-2275 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2275 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2275 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2275 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2275 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,112 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2275 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-2275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7401P is built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-2275. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.

Feature	EPYC 7401P	Xeon W-2275
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+71%	14 / 28
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.3 GHz+65%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+232%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	—
PassMark	27,836	27,974
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	19,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,596
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2275 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7401P	Xeon W-2275
Socket	TR4	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	1024 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7401P) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). Primary use case: Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.