EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-3323

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-3323 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7401P

24 / 48

27,836

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon W-3323

12 / 24

27,822

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 220W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3323

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 27,836).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $949 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌41.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3323 better than EPYC 7401P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3323 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401P pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. EPYC 7401P also has the bigger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3323 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3323 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $949 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7401P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3323 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

Xeon W-3323

The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3323 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7401P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7401P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.

Feature	EPYC 7401P	Xeon W-3323
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.9 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+256%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	27,836	27,822

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.