EPYC 7401P vs Xeon Platinum 8253

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon Platinum 8253 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7401P

24 / 48

27,836

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon Platinum 8253

16 / 32

28,165

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon Platinum 8253 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon Platinum 8253: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,836 vs 28,165).
❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8253

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7401P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8253 better than EPYC 7401P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7401P is ahead with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8253 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7401P also has the bigger cache pool with 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8253 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8253 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Platinum 8253 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8253 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7401P vs Xeon Platinum 8253 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

Xeon Platinum 8253

The Xeon Platinum 8253 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,165 points. Launch price was $3,115.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8253 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8253 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7401P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8253 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Xeon Platinum 8253's 28,165 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8253. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 22 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8253.

Feature	EPYC 7401P	Xeon Platinum 8253
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+191%	22 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	27,836	28,165+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8253 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.