
Core Ultra 7 265K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024Why buy it
- ✅+27.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,570 vs 3,283).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 36,309).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅+27.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,570 vs 3,283).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 36,309).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 265K better than Ryzen 7 7840S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 656 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 491 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 851 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1128 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 889 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 808 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 892 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 789 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 687 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 611 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265K and Ryzen 7 7840S

Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K
The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.


Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265K packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840S offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S — a 7.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265K scores 58,789 against the Ryzen 7 7840S's 23,290 — a 86.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 36,309 vs 13,500 (91.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,283 vs 2,570, a 24.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,293 vs 13,535 (48.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7840S.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+8% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 8 MB+167% |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 58,789+152% | 23,290 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 36,309+169% | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,283+28% | 2,570 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,293+65% | 13,535 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: LGA1851 (Core Ultra 7 265K) and SoC (Ryzen 7 7840S).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Graphics 64EU (Core Ultra 7 265K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 64EU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












